کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2508287 1117601 2015 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Language does not come “in boxes”: Assessing discrepancies between adverse drug reactions spontaneous reporting and MedDRA® codes in European Portuguese
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Language does not come “in boxes”: Assessing discrepancies between adverse drug reactions spontaneous reporting and MedDRA® codes in European Portuguese
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundThe description of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by health care professionals (HCPs) can be highly variable. This variation can affect the coding of a reaction with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®), the gold standard for pharmacovigilance database entries. Ultimately, the strength of a safety signal can be compromised.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess: 1) participation of different HCPs in ADR reporting, and 2) variation of language used by HCPs when describing ADRs, and to compare it with the corresponding MedDRA® codes.MethodsA retrospective content analysis was performed, using the database of spontaneous reports submitted by HCPs in the region of the Southern Pharmacovigilance Unit, Portugal. Data retrieved consisted of the idiomatic description of all ADRs occurring in 2004 (first year of the Unit activity, n = 53) and in 2012 (n = 350). The agreement between the language used by HCPs and the MedDRA® dictionary codes was quantitatively assessed.ResultsFrom a total of 403 spontaneous reports received in the two years, 896 words describing ADRs were collected. HCPs presented different levels of pharmacovigilance participation and ADR idiomatic descriptions, with pharmacists providing the greatest overall contribution. The agreement between the language used in spontaneous reports and the corresponding MedDRA® terms varied by HCP background, with nurses presenting the poorer results than medical doctors and pharmacists when considering the dictionary as the gold standard in ADRs' language.ConclusionsLexical accuracy and semantic variations exist between different HCP groups. These differences may interfere with the strength of a generated safety signal. Clinical and MedDRA® terminology training should be targeted to increase not only the frequency, but also the quality of spontaneous reports, in accordance with HCPs' experience and background.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy - Volume 11, Issue 5, September–October 2015, Pages 664–674
نویسندگان
, , ,