کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2948585 | 1577281 | 2011 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesWe sought to determine whether low platelet response to the P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel as assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein flow cytometry test (VASP-FCT) differentially affects outcomes in patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundAlthough both CKD and impaired platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel are strong predictors of unfavorable outcome after PCI, the impact of their association is unknown. The platelet VASP-FCT assay is specific for the P2Y12 ADP receptor pathway. In this test, platelet activation is expressed as the platelet reactivity index (PRI).MethodsFour-hundred forty unselected patients (CKD: 126, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m2), no-CKD: 314 eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m2) undergoing urgent (n = 336) or planned (n = 104) PCI were prospectively enrolled. In each subgroup, patients were classified as low-responders (LR: PRI ≥61%) or responders (R: PRI <61%) to clopidogrel.ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 9 ± 2 months, all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and possible stent thrombosis were higher in CKD than in no-CKD patients. Within the CKD group, the LR status was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality (25.5% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001), cardiac death (23.5% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001), all stent thrombosis (19.6% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.003), and MACE (33.3% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.007). Conversely, in no-CKD patients, the LR status did not affect outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified Killip class ≥3, drug-eluting stent implantation, and the interaction between LR and CKD (hazard ratio: 11.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 116.82; p = 0.033) as independent predictors of cardiac death.ConclusionsIn CKD patients, the presence of low platelet response to clopidogrel is associated with worse outcomes after PCI.
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology - Volume 57, Issue 4, 25 January 2011, Pages 399–408