Cardiac Dysfunction in Heart Failure: The Cardiologist's Love Affair with Time

Translating research into clinical practice has been a challenge throughout medical history. From the present review, it should be clear that this is particularly the case for heart failure. As a consequence, public awareness of this disease has been disillusionedly low, despite its prognosis being worse than that of most cancers and many other chronic diseases.We explore how over the past 150 years since Ludwig and Marey concepts about the evaluation of cardiac performance in patients with heart failure have emerged. From this historical-physiologic perspective, we have seen how 3 increasingly reductionist approaches or schools of thought have evolved in parallel, that is, an input-output approach, a hemodynamic pump approach, and a muscular pump approach. Each one of these has provided complementary insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure and has resulted in measurements or derived indices, some of which still being in use in present-day cardiology.From the third, most reductionist muscular pump approach, we have learned that myocardial and ventricular relaxation properties as well as temporal and spatial nonuniformities have been largely overlooked in the 2 other, input-output and hemodynamic pump, approaches. A key message from the present review is that relaxation and nonuniformities can be fully understood only from within the time-space continuum of cardiac pumping. As cyclicity and rhythm are, in some way, the most basic aspects of cardiac function, considerations of time should dominate over any measurement of cardiac performance as a muscular pump. Any measurement that is blind for the arrow of cardiac time should therefore be interpreted with caution.We have seen how the escape from the time domain—as with the calculation of LV ejection fraction—fascinating though as it may be, has undoubtedly served to hinder a rational scientific debate on the recent, so-called systolic-diastolic heart failure controversy. Lacking appreciation of early relaxation abnormalities and inappropriate degrees of nonuniformities has, indeed, led to some unfortunate misunderstandings about the pathophysiologic time progression of heart failure, in particular, heart failure with compensated hemodynamic pump function (ie, with normal or preserved LV ejection fraction).We have seen that with the introduction of newer powerful diagnostic techniques, as, for example, TDI and MRI, to evaluate ventricular “muscular pump” function, this debate can now be held in a more serene physiologic context. These aspects will be elaborated further in subsequent chapter papers of this symposium.With ongoing stem and other cell-based therapies and future reductionistic insights into cardiac cellular performance, we foresee the emergence of a fourth simple-parallel school of thought viewing the heart as a network of communicating different cell types, that is, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, neurons. In this postgenomic age with the introduction of the rapidly evolving discipline of in vivo molecular imaging techniques, we anticipate that novel measurements of cardiac performance in patients with heart failure will soon become available and complement biopsy and other already available cardiac cellular biomarkers (cardiac troponin I; creatine kinase–MB; myoglobin; BNP).Through the use of these novel biomarkers as a fourth diagnostic track in the evaluation of cardiac performance in patients with heart failure, we will soon be able to increasingly understand the behavior of the heart as a complex biologic system—in other words, how these “low-level” biologic functions and signal transduction pathways at a cellular level contribute to the above “high-level” or system-level approach of cardiac performance at the muscular, the hemodynamic, and the input-output pump system levels and, hopefully, how they could contribute to an early diagnosis of chronic heart failure, in patients.