کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3007805 1578985 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The prognostic value of the grey-to-white matter ratio in cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزش پیش بینی نسبت ماده خاکستری به سفید در بیماران ایست قلبی تحت درمان با اکسیژن غشای خارج بدن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی

AimThe grey-to-white matter ratio (GWR) is a reliable predictor of the neurological outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the reliability in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) remains unknown. We evaluated the utility of the GWR in predicting neurological outcomes in ECPR-treated patients.MethodsThis single-centre retrospective study was conducted from July 2009 to January 2014. Patients who received ECPR for OHCA were classified into two groups: Cerebral performance category(CPC) 1–2 was defined as good, CPC 3–5 as poor outcome. Four GWR (GWR-AV[average], GWR-CO[cortex], GWR-BG[basal ganglia], and GWR-SI [simplified])were evaluated and compared between the groups.ResultsOf 38 patients who received ECPR for OHCA, 30 patients were enrolled. Five (16.7%) had a good outcome and 25(83.3%) a poor outcome. All GWR were significantly higher in the good outcome group than in the poor outcome group. ROC curve analysis produced the following areas under the curve: GWR-AV = 0.920 (95% CI 0.761 to 0.987), GWR-BG = 0.872 (95%CI 0.699 to 0.965), GWR-CO = 0.952 (95% CI 0.806 to 0.997), and GWR-SI = 0.848(95% CI 0.670 to 0.962). The cut-off value with 100% specificity for the prediction of the poor outcome was 1.23 for GWR-AV (sensitivity: 76%), 1.24 for GWR-BG (sensitivity: 88.0%), 1.22 for GWR-CO (sensitivity: 64%), and 1.21 for GWR-SI (sensitivity: 76%).ConclusionsIn ECPR, GWR of patients with poor outcome was significantly lower than that of patients with good outcome.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Resuscitation - Volume 99, February 2016, Pages 50–55
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,