Osteophytes, juxta-articular radiolucencies and cancellous bone changes in the proximal tibia of patients with knee osteoarthritis

SummaryObjectiveTo determine differences in tibial cancellous bone organisation in knee osteoarthritis (OA) between the central weight-bearing region and juxta-articular radiolucencies adjacent to small, medium or large marginal osteophytes.MethodsPatients with medial compartment OA (n = 60; F = 39), mean (SD) age 60.0 (9.7) years, and non-OA reference subjects (n = 21; F = 5), mean (SD) age 36.8 (11.5) years, had ×4 macroradiographs digitised by laser scanner. Using a modified Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARS) Atlas, right and/or left knees were graded according to marginal osteophyte size into those with small (n = 30), medium (n = 30) or large (n = 27) marginal osteophytes, identified as OPH1, OPH2 and OPH3, respectively. Non-OA knees (n = 30) were anatomically normal. Computerised method of Fractal Signature Analysis (FSA) quantified differences in cancellous bone structure between non-OA and osteophyte subgroups at two regions of interest (ROIs); central weight-bearing and tibial margin.ResultsCompared to non-OA, vertical trabecular number increased significantly (P < 0.05) in all osteophyte subgroups (width range 0.12–1.14 mm) within both ROIs. In OPH3, this increase was significantly (P < 0.05) greater compared to OPH2 in the central ROI, and to OPH2 and OPH1 in the marginal ROI at most trabecular widths (0.12–1.14 mm). In the marginal ROI, compared to non-OA, horizontal trabeculae number decreased in all osteophyte subgroups. This decrease was significantly greater in OPH3 compared to OPH2 and OPH1 at small to medium trabecular widths (0.12–0.54 mm).ConclusionCompared to disease associated bone loss at the central ROI of the tibia, the extent of juxta-articular bone loss appears to be associated with the size of the marginal osteophytes.