کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
345967 617778 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
How early is early intervention and who should get it? Contested meanings in determining thresholds for intervention
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اوایل مداخله چقدر زودهنگام است و چه کسی باید آن را دریافت کند؟ معانی رقابت در تعیین آستانه برای مداخله
کلمات کلیدی
سیستم های حفاظت از کودکان؛ مداخله زودهنگام؛ نامزدی؛ آستانه؛ تحقیقات ارزیابی کیفی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پریناتولوژی (پزشکی مادر و جنین)، طب اطفال و بهداشت کودک
چکیده انگلیسی


• We report on the evaluation of a significant policy reform in NSW, Australia
• We conducted interviews and focus groups with 115 staff from a variety of human services agencies
• Support for early intervention is widespread, but the meaning of it is contested
• Determining levels of risk, and support required, is felt as a significant burden by service providers
• Practitioners are active in classifying families; structured decision making tools complement but do not replace judgement
• Supportive responses remain challenging for child welfare systems

The latest wave of reforms of the child protection system in Australia have been based on attempts to provide support to all families with vulnerable children, rather than increasing surveillance of ‘at risk’ families and forensic responses to incidents of maltreatment. This includes a drive to widen the remit of child protection from the statutory child protection agency and involve other government agencies such as health and education as well as the non-government sector in child protection. This paper reports on the effects of one such reform, the NSW initiative Keep Them Safe. It focuses on the classification of families as needing either early intervention or intensive support, using thematic analysis of qualitative interview data.MethodInterviews and focus groups were conducted with practitioners and managers from human service agencies (total n = 115), and discussed their perceptions of the initiative and the changes it had introduced to service delivery.FindingsPractitioners discussed family needs in ways which contested the policy meanings of ‘early intervention’: whether families are conceptualised in terms of their needs or risk; whether engagement with services should be voluntary or mandated; and whether the agencies to support them should be the statutory agency or an NGO. The implications for these tensions, in terms of policy and practice, are discussed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Children and Youth Services Review - Volume 55, August 2015, Pages 121–127
نویسندگان
, ,