کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
372570 622125 2016 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Teaching strategies and differential effectiveness across learning contexts: Evidence from PISA 2012
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
استراتژی های تدریس و اثربخشی دیفرانسیل در سراسر زمینه های یادگیری: شواهدی از PISA 2012
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم اجتماعی آموزش
چکیده انگلیسی


• Cognitive activation is positively related to mathematics performance.
• A positive disciplinary climate favours cognitive activation.
• Teacher directed instruction is positively related to mathematics performance.
• But high levels of directed instruction are negative for student performance.

Modern educational theories emphasise effectiveness enhancing factors at the classroom level and differential effectiveness for sub-groups of students and across different learning contexts. Theoretical developments, however, are generally based on national evidence and have been criticised for lacking cross-cultural perspectives. This study used PISA 2012 data to examine how subject-specific teaching strategies related to mathematics performance of students across education systems whilst considering curvilinear associations and interactions with the socio-economic and instructional context. The results provide consistent evidence of a positive curvilinear relationship between cognitive activation strategies and mathematics performance. The association tends to be stronger in schools with a positive disciplinary climate and for students from advantaged socio-economic backgrounds, but not in every education system. Teacher-directed strategies are positively related to mathematics performance, but the association tends to become negative for high levels of teacher-directed instruction. Associations of student-oriented strategies with mathematics performance are inconsistent. The cross-national evidence contributes to the knowledge base of educational theory.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Studies in Educational Evaluation - Volume 49, June 2016, Pages 30–41
نویسندگان
, , ,