کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3945391 | 1254265 | 2016 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Identification of poor outcome characteristics and long-term survival indicators
• Increased VEGF-A expression in metastatic brain samples compared to controls
• Multi-modality therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes.
ObjectiveNo standardized treatment strategies exist for patients with gynecologic malignancies complicated by brain metastases. Identification of poor outcome characteristics, long-term survival indicators, and molecular markers could help individualize and optimize treatment.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 100 gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastases treated at our institution between January 1990 and June 2009. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of brain metastases. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate associations between OS and clinical factors. We used immunohistochemistry to examine expression of five molecular markers in primary tumors and brain metastases in a subset of patients and matched controls. Statistical tests included the Student's paired t-test (for marker expression) and Kaplan-Meier test (for correlations).ResultsOn univariate analysis, primary ovarian disease, CA-125 < 81 units/mL at brain metastases diagnosis, and isolated versus multi-focal metastases were all associated with longer survival. Isolated brain metastasis remained the only significant predictor on multivariate analysis (HR 2.66; CI 1.19–5.93; p = 0.017). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) was higher in metastatic brain samples than in primary tumors of controls (p < 0.0001). None of the molecular markers were significantly associated with survival.ConclusionsMulti-modality therapy may lead to improved clinical outcomes, and VEGF therapy should be investigated in treatment of brain metastases.
Journal: Gynecologic Oncology - Volume 142, Issue 1, July 2016, Pages 76–82