کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4428182 1619285 2015 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The effect of substrate to inoculum ratios on the anaerobic digestion of human faecal material
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اثر سوبسترا نسبت به میزان انجماد در هضم بی هوازی مواد فیشر انسان
کلمات کلیدی
عملکرد متان، هضم بی هوازی ماده مضر انسانی، کاهش پاتوژن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The anaerobic digestion of human faecal material was investigated.
• The substrate to inoculum ratio (SIR) was important for methanogenesis.
• The highest amounts of methane production was achieved in the 0.5 SIR incubations.
• The highest pathogen removal was also achieved in the 0.5 SIR incubations.

The anaerobic digestion (AD) of human faecal material (HFM) was investigated to consider the effect different substrate to inoculum ratios (SIR) from 0.5 to 4 on the rate and extent of methane production as well as impact on pathogen numbers. The AD process was monitored by measuring pH, total volatile fatty acid, bicarbonate alkalinity, ammonium and methane production. The results showed that the highest amounts of methane production with a value of 254.4 ±12.6 ml CH4gVSadded−1 and highest pathogen removal with a value of 2.7×104±40 and 2.5×103±0.5 CFU/ml, respectively, for E.coli   and faecal coliform bacteria was achieved by the 0.5 SIR incubation. However, the highest organic loading found in the 4.0 SIR incubation showed the lowest methane yield with a value of 110 ±1.3 ml CH4gVSadded−1 and the lowest pathogen removal with a value of 3.2×105±19 and 3.2×104±3.5 CFU/ml, respectively for E.coli and faecal coliform bacteria. The empirical equation was used to calculate the theoretical methane and compare this with the actual values of methane production. The relatively high methane conversion efficiency between theoretical and actual values for 0.5 SIR, further suggest that this operational condition was the most effective.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Environmental Technology & Innovation - Volume 3, April 2015, Pages 121–129
نویسندگان
, , , , ,