Postflowering photoperiod regulates vegetative growth and reproductive development of soybean

Soybean development is controlled by environmental factors, primarily photoperiod and temperature. To date, photoperiod effects on flowering have been well studied but the performances and mechanism of postflowering photoperiod responses have not been fully understood, especially for the photoperiod effects on vegetative growth after flowering. In the present study, the responses of vegetative growth and reproductive development in soybean to different postflowering photoperiod regimes were investigated in four separate experiments. Three varieties of different maturity groups (MG) including the early (Dongnong 36, MG 000), medium (Dandou 5, MG IV), and late (Zigongdongdou, MG IX) were exposed to two photoperiods, short (10, 12 h) and long (15, 16 or 18 h). The results showed that postflowering photoperiod not only regulated reproductive development but also affected vegetative growth. Even when flowers and pods were removed, short-day (SD) treatment promoted leaf senescence. The onset of leaf senescence among varieties tested appeared to be dependent on photoperiod sensitivity. Leaf senescence of the late-maturing variety of Zigongdongdou (sensitive to photoperiod) was delayed more significantly than that of the medium and early-maturing varieties (less sensitive to photoperiod). Long-day (LD) treatments delayed leaf senescence and seed maturation in the late-maturing variety of Zigongdongdou plants with only the SD-induced leaves produced before flowering. LD treatments imposed from the beginning bloom, beginning pod setting or beginning seed filling delayed leaf senescence and seed maturation of late-maturing soybean variety (Zigongdongdou). Results of night-break with red (R) and far-red (FR) light demonstrated that postflowering photoperiod responses of soybean were R/FR reversible reactions and the phytochromes seemed to be functional as receptors of photoperiod signals even after flowering. It was proposed that the regulation of photoperiod on development of soybean was effective from emergence through maturation, and the postflowering photoperiod signals were also mediated by phytochromes similar to those before flowering. The flowering reversion in late-MG soybean varieties under LD was a direct result of LD and was not due to secondary effect of abscission of pods and flowers. Soybean leaves not only received SD signals but also LD signals; furthermore, the LD effects reversed the SD effects and vice versa.