کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی نسخه تمام متن
4939021 1363688 2017 10 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید دانلود کنید
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله
Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقايسه دقيقترين منابع کتابشناختی ايجاد شده برای استناد نامه های پزشکی توسط EndNote، Mendeley، RefWorks و Zotero
کلمات کلیدی
دقت؛ منابع کتابشناسی؛ سبک استناد؛ EndNote؛ مجلات پزشکی؛ مندلی؛ مدیران مرجع؛ RefWorks؛ زوترو؛
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم اجتماعی آموزش
چکیده انگلیسی

ABSTRACTBibliographical references to online and printed articles, books, contributions to edited books and web resources generated by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero were compared with manually written references according to the citation instructions in 15 biomedical journals and the NLM citation style. The fewest mistakes were detected in references generated by Zotero for 11 journals and the NLM style, while the second fewest number of mistakes was found in Mendeley. The largest number of mistakes for 9 journals was found in references generated by EndNote and in the other 4 journals the largest number of mistakes was detected in RefWorks references. With regard to the individual types of resources, the lowest number of mistakes was shown by Zotero, while RefWorks had the greatest number of mistakes. All programs had problems especially with generating the URL and the date of access in the reference to online documents. It was also found that several mistakes were caused by technical limitations of the reference managers, while other mistakes originated due to incorrect setting of the citation styles. A comparison showed that Zotero and Mendeley are the most suitable managers.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Academic Librarianship - Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 57-66
نویسندگان
,