It's time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link

- Meta-analysis on transdisciplinary link between self-control and deviance
- Mr = 0.415 and Mr = 0.345 for cross-sectional, longitudinal studies respectively
- Study design irrelevant for self-control-deviance link, as originally theorized
- Studies with more males, older or US-based populations, found weaker effects
- No evidence of publication biases, based on multiple different tests

PurposeThe current meta-analysis examines the link between self-control and measures of crime and deviance, taking stock of the empirical status of self-control theory and focusing on work published between 2000 and 2010.MethodsA total of 796 studies were reviewed for inclusion/exclusion criteria and yielded a final study sample of 99 studies (88 cross-sectional and 19 longitudinal effect sizes, analyzed separately). Random effects mean correlations between self-control and deviance were analyzed for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, respectively. Publication bias was assessed using multiple methods.ResultsA random effects mean correlation between self-control and deviance was Mr = 0.415 for cross-sectional studies and Mr = 0.345 for longitudinal ones; this effect did not significantly differ by study design. Studies with more male participants, studies based on older or US-based populations, and self-report studies found weaker effects.ConclusionsSubstantial empirical support was found for the main argument of self-control theory and on the transdisciplinary link between self-control and measures of crime and deviance. In contrast to Pratt and Cullen, but consistent with theory, the effect from cross-sectional versus longitudinal studies did not significantly differ. There was no evidence of publication bias.