Mechanisms underlying long-term fear memory formation from a metaplastic neuronal state

- LTM produced from a metaplastic state requires protein kinase A signaling in the amygdala.
- A second conditioning or retrieval trial does not destabilize the metaplastic state engaged by the first trial.
- The mechanism by which LTM is produced from a metaplastic state is distinct from memory reconsolidation.

We previously showed that a single weak fear conditioning trial, that does not produce a long-term fear memory (LTM), appeared to prime memory formation such that when a second trial followed within a circumscribed time window a robust and long-lasting fear memory was formed. We also showed that this priming effect could be blocked if we interfered with protein kinase A (PKA) signaling in the amygdala during the first conditioning trial. The goals of the current study were to determine if LTM formation after the second trial depends on PKA signaling in the amygdala and to characterize the underlying memory processes engaged during the second trial that allows for LTM formation. Our interpretation of the original findings is that the second conditioning trial triggers LTM from a metaplastic state that is engaged by the first conditioning trial. However, it is also possible that the second conditioning trial acts as a reminder of the first and engages a reconsolidation-like process. Several experiments were conducted to distinguish between these two possibilities. We show that interfering with PKA signaling during the second conditioning trial disrupts memory formation. However, if a third trial follows the second or if the second trial was presented without shock, the PKA inhibitor was no longer effective. Our findings demonstrate that the induction of fear memory from a metaplastic state involves new learning that is distinct from retrieval-dependent updating of memories.