|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|5043910||1370604||2018||13 صفحه PDF||ندارد||دانلود کنید|
Brief interventions are effective in improving health behaviours including alcohol intake, however the effectiveness of brief interventions targeting nutrition outcomes has not been determined. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of brief nutrition interventions in adults. Seven databases were searched for RCT/pseudo RCT studies published in English to April 2016, and evaluating brief interventions (i.e. single point of contact) designed to promote change in eating behaviours in healthy adults (â¥18 years). Of 4849 articles identified, 45 studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies targeted fruit and/or vegetable intake (nÂ =Â 21) or fat intake (nÂ =Â 10), and few targeted diet quality (nÂ =Â 2). Median follow-up was 3.5 months, with few studies (nÂ =Â 4) measuring longer-term outcomes (â¥12 months). Studies aimed to determine whether a brief intervention was more effective than another brief intervention (nÂ =Â 30), and/or more effective than no intervention (nÂ =Â 20), with 17 and 11 studies, respectively, reporting findings to that effect. Interventions providing education plus tailored or instructional components (e.g. feedback) were more effective than education alone or non-tailored advice. This review suggests that brief interventions, which are tailored and instructional, can improve short-term dietary behaviours, however evidence for longer-term behaviour change maintenance is limited.
Journal: Appetite - Volume 120, 1 January 2018, Pages 335-347