کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5045764 1475892 2017 21 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Systematic review of measurement properties of questionnaires measuring somatization in primary care patients
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مرور نظام‌مند خصیصه‌های اندازه گیری پرسشنامه های اندازه گیری جسمانی‌سازی در بیماران مراقبت های اولیه
کلمات کلیدی
خصیصه‌های اندازه‌گیری؛ مراقبت‌های اولیه؛ پرسشنامه‌های خودگزارش‌دهی؛ جسمانی‌سازی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
چکیده انگلیسی


- We systematically reviewed somatization questionnaires using COSMIN methodology.
- We included 24 articles describing 52 studies on 9 different questionnaires.
- The PHQ-15 and 4DSQ somatization subscale were studied the most.
- These two questionnaires are recommended for measuring somatization in primary care.

ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to critically appraise the evidence on measurement properties of self-report questionnaires measuring somatization in adult primary care patients and to provide recommendations about which questionnaires are most useful for this purpose.MethodsWe assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. To draw overall conclusions about the quality of the questionnaires, we conducted an evidence synthesis using predefined criteria for judging the measurement properties.ResultsWe found 24 articles on 9 questionnaires. Studies on the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) and the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) somatization subscale prevailed and covered the broadest range of measurement properties. These questionnaires had the best internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, and construct validity. The PHQ-15 also had good criterion validity, whereas the 4DSQ somatization subscale was validated in several languages. The Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS) checklist had good internal consistency and structural validity. Some evidence was found for good construct validity and criterion validity of the Physical Symptom Checklist (PSC-51) and good construct validity of the Symptom Check-List (SCL-90-R) somatization subscale. However, these three questionnaires were only studied in a small number of primary care studies.ConclusionBased on our findings, we recommend the use of either the PHQ-15 or 4DSQ somatization subscale for somatization in primary care. Other questionnaires, such as the BDS checklist, PSC-51 and the SCL-90-R somatization subscale show promising results but have not been studied extensively in primary care.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Research - Volume 103, December 2017, Pages 42-62
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,