کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5046345 1475976 2017 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A qualitative study of speaking out about patient safety concerns in intensive care units
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک مطالعه کیفی از صحبت کردن در مورد نگرانی های ایمنی بیمار در بخش مراقبت های ویژه
کلمات کلیدی
انگلستان؛ ایمنی بیمار؛ صحبت کردن؛ واحدهای مراقبت های ویژه؛ کیفی؛ حرفه ای های بهداشتی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Most opportunities to raise safety concerns may arise in routine clinical work.
- Informal strategies for raising concerns are multiple and often effective.
- Use of strategies varies within and between professional groups and hierarchies.
- Increased focus on effective use of informal strategies of social control is needed.

Much policy focus has been afforded to the role of “whistleblowers” in raising concerns about quality and safety of patient care in healthcare settings. However, most opportunities for personnel to identify and act on these concerns are likely to occur much further upstream, in the day-to-day mundane interactions of everyday work. Using qualitative data from over 900 h of ethnographic observation and 98 interviews across 19 English intensive care units (ICUs), we studied how personnel gave voice to concerns about patient safety or poor practice. We observed much low-level social control occurring as part of day-to-day functioning on the wards, with challenges and sanctions routinely used in an effort to prevent or address mistakes and norm violations. Pre-emptions were used to intervene when patients were at immediate risk, and included strategies such as gentle reminders, use of humour, and sharp words. Corrective interventions included education and evidence-based arguments, while sanctions that were applied when it appeared that a breach of safety had occurred included “quiet words”, bantering, public exposure or humiliation, scoldings and brutal reprimands. These forms of social control generally functioned effectively to maintain safe practice. But they were not consistently effective, and sometimes risked reinforcing norms and idiosyncratic behaviours that were not necessarily aligned with goals of patient safety and high-quality healthcare. Further, making challenges across professional boundaries or hierarchies was sometimes problematic. Our findings suggest that an emphasis on formal reporting or communication training as the solution to giving voice to safety concerns is simplistic; a more sophisticated understanding of social control is needed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science & Medicine - Volume 193, November 2017, Pages 8-15
نویسندگان
, , , ,