Automobile dependence and physical inactivity: Insights from the California Household Travel Survey

- We use 2012-13 CHTS to analyze the auto dependence-physical inactivity connection
- Auto-dependents spend 15 min/day in physical activity, one-third that of discretionary transit users
- Some auto-dependents, however, are exceptionally active; we analyze determining factors
- We propose strategies to get sedentary auto-dependents out of physical inactivity
- We suggest strategies to attract auto-dependents into transit

BackgroundAuto-dependence has been linked to the physical inactivity epidemic across U.S. cities, resulting in unprecedented increases in incidences of obesity, cardiovascular diseases, depression, etc. The search for strategies to pull an overwhelming majority of auto-dependents out of their sedentary lifestyles by encouraging them to use transit, walk and bike continues to challenge planners and policy-makers.MethodsWe use the 2012-13 California Household Travel Survey data for analyzing the auto-dependence and physical inactivity connection. We select a sample of employed individuals with access to car in urban California, and classify them as discretionary transit riders (N=390), active auto-dependents (N=1287), or sedentary auto-dependents (N=8754) based on their self-reported travel mode use and time spent in physical activity over a 24-h period. We investigate factors that are associated with significantly high physical activity among some auto-dependents relative to the sedentary majority. We also revisit the transit-physical activity connection, and explore conditions that make transit use unfeasible for some active auto-dependents.ResultsDiscretionary transit use is associated with higher physical activity. However, there is large variation in physical activity within auto-dependents; significantly higher physical activity is associated with factors such as higher income, flexible work schedule, shorter work hours, and mixed land use. Kids, inflexibility of work schedule, low residential density, lack of pedestrian and bicycling friendly street design, and long distance to transit stops prohibit otherwise active auto-dependents from choosing transit. Employment sector influences both physical activity and choice of transit.ConclusionTo get sedentary auto-dependents out of endemic physical inactivity, our research indicates the need for targeting lower-incomes, incentivizing employers to provide flexible work hours, and to continue dense, mixed-use developments that make active travel feasible. In addition, to get active auto-dependents to use transit, transit managers must focus on retaining immigrant riders and non-Hispanic Asians, and attracting people with children.