Bulk tank milk antibody ELISA as a biosecurity tool for detecting dairy herds with past exposure to Mycoplasma bovis

In Australia, one of the biosecurity recommendations to help prevent the introduction of Mycoplasma bovis into a dairy herd is to use a PCR assay on bulk tank milk (BTM) samples to evaluate the M. bovis infection status of potential source herds. An alternative approach is to assess the immunological status of the herd with respect to previous exposure to M. bovis via the use of an ELISA that is commercially available for use on cattle milk and serum. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate factors potentially associated with variation in the ELISA BTM optical density coefficient (ODC%) in previously exposed herds, (2) evaluate the association between the proportion of cows that are ELISA positive and the BTM ELISA ODC%, (3) assess agreement between the BTM ELISA and PCR and culture, and (4) compare BTM ELISA ODC% between the “hospital” herd and the main lactating herd on the same farm. Bulk tank milk samples (n = 192) were collected from 19 dairy herds with a history of clinical M. bovis disease and from 6 control herds (herds with no known clinical cases of mycoplasmosis). For 28 of the BTM samples collected, blood was also collected from 50 lactating cows contributing to that bulk tank sample. From 1 herd, concurrent paired BTM samples were collected from the main herd and the hospital herd on 16 occasions. All BTM samples were analyzed by ELISA (Bio-X Bio K 302, Bio-X Diagnostics, Rochefort, Belgium), PCR, and culture. The BTM ELISA ODC% was associated with time since initial M. bovis outbreak and time since the start of the herd's calving period. Following an initial outbreak of M. bovis, the BTM ELISA ODC% was highest in the first 8 mo. In split- and seasonal-calving herds, significantly higher BTM ELISA ODC% results were observed 5 to 8 wk after the commencement of the calving period. A significant association was observed between the within-herd seroprevalence for the lactating herd and BTM ELISA ODC%, but within-herd seroprevalence explained little of the variation in BTM ELISA ODC%. When comparing the BTM ELISA with a multiplex probe PCR and culture followed by 16S to 23S rRNA sequencing, there was virtually no agreement above that expected by chance; prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa values were 0.22 and 0.25 for ELISA category versus PCR category and culture, respectively. Finally, the hospital herd BTM ELISA ODC% mirrored that for the main herd BTM but was significantly higher. This study demonstrates that this commercially available ELISA used on BTM samples may complement the use of BTM PCR or culture in identifying herds from which purchase of animals may pose a higher biosecurity risk for introduction of M. bovis into noninfected herds.