Recruiting colorectal cancer survivors to a surveillance study: Barriers and successful strategies

- Effective strategies to recruit CRC survivors to surveillance studies are needed.
- This mixed-methods study included qualitative data collection and a statewide survey.
- Telephone-based data collection strategies were most effective.
- More call attempts were required to recruit African American participants.

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) survival rates are increasing. Effective strategies to recruit CRC survivors to surveillance studies are needed.ObjectiveWe analyzed the barriers encountered while recruiting CRC survivors to a study assessing their surveillance care experiences.MethodsThe study included three phases: (I) focus groups/key informant interviews; (II) cognitive interviews; and (III) a statewide population-based telephone survey.ParticipantsIn Phases I-II, clinic-based data and cancer center registries were used to identify CRC survivors who had received CRC resection within the past 18 months. In Phase III, survivors who had received CRC resection within the past two years were identified via a statewide, population-based cancer registry.ResultsIn Phase I, 16 survivors participated in focus groups at two National Cancer Center-affiliated sites (response rate = 29.6%). Eighteen additional survivors participated in individual interviews (response rate = 50%). In Phase II, 11 survivors participated in cognitive interviews (response rate = 81.8%). In Phase III, 150 survivors participated in the statewide survey (response rate = 62.2%).ConclusionsGroup-based/in-person recruitment efforts were unsuccessful due to scheduling barriers, lack of transportation, and remaining discomfort from previous resection surgery. Telephone-based data collection strategies produced higher response rates.Practice implicationsTo enhance CRC surveillance research, future studies could incorporate CRC survivor-centered recruitment strategies.

136