Bicarbonate dialysis compared to hemodiafiltration on glycemic excursions in patients with end-stage renal disease with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

AimTo evaluate the effects on glycemic excursions during bicarbonate dialysis (BHD) compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF) in type 2 diabetic or not diabetic patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Material and MethodsThirty-six patients (20 affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 16 not diabetic patients) were evaluated and underwent BHD dialysis, followed by HDF dialysis two days later. All patients underwent also glucose continuous monitoring system, using iPro Continuous Glucose Monitor System (Medtronic MiniMed) starting just before the BHD, and ending five days later, two days after the HDF dialysis. Glycemic control was estimated as the mean blood glucose (MBG), the area under the glucose curve above 70 mg/dl (AUC> 70) or 180 mg/dl (AUC> 180), and the percentage of time above 70 mg/dl (t> 70) or 180 mg/dl (t> 180). Intraday glycemic variability was assessed as the standard deviation (SD), M value, and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Day-to-day glycemic variability was assessed as the mean of daily difference (MODD), that is the mean of the absolute difference among glucose values taken on 2 consecutive days at the same time.Resultsglycemic control was better with HDF: MBG, and AUC> 180 were lower during HDF compared do BHD. We also observed a significant decrease of glycemic excursions during HDF dialysis: SD, M value, and the MAGE value were lower with HDF. The MODD value was significantly changed in BHD group, while no differences were recorded during HDF.ConclusionHDF seems to greater reduce glycemic excursions during the treatment compared to BHD.