کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6204647 | 1603746 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Development and validation of a patient-specific knee model to estimate the effect of patellar cut.
- Identification of the constitutive material law for the patellar bone.
- Case study: patient after total knee arthroplasty with deeper patellar cut than recommended.
- Deeper patellar cut led to negligible increase of patellar strain as compared with the recommended one.
BackgroundInappropriate patellar cut during total knee arthroplasty can lead to patellar complications due to increased bone strain. In this study, we evaluated patellar bone strain of a patient who had a deeper patellar cut than the recommended.MethodsA patient-specific model based on patient preoperative data was created. The model was decoupled into two levels: knee and patella. The knee model predicted kinematics and forces on the patella during squat movement. The patella model used these values to predict bone strain after total knee arthroplasty. Mechanical properties of the patellar bone were identified with micro-finite element modeling testing of cadaveric samples. The model was validated with a robotic knee simulator and postoperative X-rays. For this patient, we compared the deeper patellar cut depth to the recommended one, and evaluated patellar bone volume with octahedral shear strain above 1%.FindingsModel predictions were consistent with experimental measurements of the robotic knee simulator and postoperative X-rays. Compared to the recommended cut, the deeper cut increased the critical strain bone volume, but by less than 3% of total patellar volume.InterpretationWe thus conclude that the predicted increase in patellar strain should be within an acceptable range, since this patient had no complaints 8Â months after surgery. This validated patient-specific model will later be used to address other questions on groups of patients, to eventually improve surgical planning and outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
Journal: Clinical Biomechanics - Volume 32, February 2016, Pages 212-219