Assessment of the test-retest reliability of a foot placement accuracy protocol in assisted-living older adults

- The protocol to assess the ability to execute accurate volitional steps during walking is reliable and location-independent.
- Digital cameras have the advantage of being lightweight and portable, and permit data collection in a home environment.
- Exercise interventions able to cause changes in foot placement accuracy performance should be designed and tested.

IntroductionThis study assessed the test-retest reliability of a foot placement accuracy protocol in a population of assisted-living elderly. The goal was to evaluate the execution of foot placement performance with increasing complexity of the walking condition.MethodsTwenty-five elderly participants (5 males, 20 females, 80.4 ± 8.6 years) were assessed by one observer in two sessions with 48 h between the measurements. Participants walked at self-selected pace along a pathway with three different walking conditions composed of two rectangular foam target locations and an obstacle on the walking surface. The main outcome measures were foot placement distance error, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD).ResultsMean absolute values of the foot placement distance errors were 14.0 ± 4.5 mm for medio-lateral deviation and 27.2 ± 2.1 mm for anterior-posterior deviation, respectively. ICC values for test-retest reliability showed 'fair to good' to 'excellent' reliability across all conditions with values ranging from 0.63 to 0.94. SDD values were between 3.6 and 37.3 mm.ConclusionThe protocol showed good reliability for test-retest measurements of foot placement accuracy, thus making this protocol a reliable and location-independent tool to assess performance of foot placement in elderly in assisted-living settings. In the future, measurements with elderly fallers and non-fallers should be conducted to assess validity of the protocol.