کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
896051 | 1472293 | 2012 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
The management of risk and crises is increasingly seen as a matter of mobilizing formal, rational and calculative systems. Still, the capacity to understand and evaluate the social context within which risk and crises are embedded is of great importance. Examining the case of the outbreak of Marburg haemorrhagic fever in Angola in 2004–2005, the concept of trading zone is proposed as a mechanism bridging international expertise (in this case, that of the medical experts of the World Health Organization) and the local actors’ (Angolan health care workers, elders, etc.) understandings of the needs and demands of the community. Recognizing that risks are by definition impossible to fully anticipate, management practice, as part of organizing should emphasize not only rational systems for monitoring and controlling risk and crises, but also the value of including trading zones and a metacode as a pidgin that facilitates collaboration between heterogeneous groups in such zones, each understanding their reality based on local, cultural codes.
► This paper reports the World Health Organization's (WHO) efforts to respond to the outbreak of a deadly haemorrhagic fever.
► The paper frames the efforts as a case where “Western” and “indigenous” knowledge spaces interact to handle the health crisis.
► Members of the two knowledge spaces initially fail to establish joint arenas - trading zones - where they can meet and exchange ideas meaningfully.
► The paper argues that the effective organizing of professional expertise as part of crisis management would benefit from including trading zones from the outset.
Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Management - Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 340–351