Neuropsychological differences between obsessive-compulsive washers and checkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Inconsistent neuropsychological findings in OCD may rely on symptom heterogeneity.
• We conducted the first meta-analysis comparing OCD washers vs. checkers.
• Systematic search resulted in 13 international studies including 535 patients.
• 38 of 41 effect sizes showed that washers performed better than checkers.
• Large effect sizes indicated checkers' poorer performance in planning and response inhibition.

Inconsistent results in neuropsychological research of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be the result of the heterogeneous nature of OCD symptoms. The most frequently investigated symptoms are contamination/cleaning and doubt/checking. The aim of this review was to determine whether OCD washers and checkers differ in their neuropsychological performance. We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 studies (including 535 patients) comprising tests in 10 different neuropsychological domains. Washers showed significant better task performance than checkers in 8 of 10 cognitive domains. Large effect sizes were found in planning/problem solving and response inhibition. Effect size in set shifting was medium, whereas effect sizes in attention, processing speed, encoding, verbal memory and nonverbal memory were small. Limitations consisted in a relatively small number of primary studies. In line with current neurobiological findings, the results provide further evidence for the validity of different symptom dimensions in OCD. Clinical and theoretical implications are discussed.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide