کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
931849 1474644 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
چگونه نفی درک می شود: شواهد از پارادایم دنیای بصری
کلمات کلیدی
انکار، دودویی، چندین نفر، نمایندگی، در حال پردازش
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب شناختی
چکیده انگلیسی


• We used the visual world paradigm to study how negation is understood.
• People looked at the figure representing the alternative in a binary context.
• People looked at the figure representing the negated argument in a multary context.
• This finding would indicate that symbolic representation of negation is possible.

This paper explores how negation (e.g., the figure is not red) is understood using the visual world paradigm. Our hypothesis is that people will switch to the alternative affirmative (e.g., a green figure) whenever possible, but will be able to maintain the negated argument (e.g., a non-red figure) when needed. To test this, we presented either a specific verbal context (binary: the figure could be red or green) or an unspecified verbal context (multary: the figure could be red or green or yellow or blue). Then, affirmative and negative sentences (e.g., the figure is (not) red) were heard while four figures were shown on the screen and eye movements were monitored. We found that people shifted their visual attention toward the alternative in the binary context, but focused on the negated argument in the multary context. Our findings corroborated our hypothesis and shed light on two issues that are currently under debate about how negation is represented and processed. Regarding representation, our results support the ideas that (1) the negative operator plays a role in the mental representation, and consequently a symbolic representation of negation is possible, and (2) it is not necessary to use a two-step process to represent and understand negation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Memory and Language - Volume 74, July 2014, Pages 36–45
نویسندگان
, , ,