کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
949141 1475911 2016 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Developmental study of treatment fidelity, safety and acceptability of a Symptoms Clinic intervention delivered by General Practitioners to patients with multiple medically unexplained symptoms
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مطالعه تکاملی در مورد اعتماد به درمان، ایمنی و پذیرش مداخلات بالینی علائم ارائه شده توسط پزشکان عمومی توسط بیماران با علائم پزشکی غیرقابل توضیح
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Experienced GPs were trained to deliver the Symptoms Clinic Intervention to patients.
• This developmental study assessed fidelity, safety and acceptability of delivery.
• The recognition component received the most time; explanation and action received less.
• Patients who benefitted most described receiving all three components.

BackgroundThere is a need for primary care interventions for patients with multiple medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). We examined whether GPs could be taught to deliver one such intervention, the Symptoms Clinic Intervention (SCI), to patients. The intervention includes recognition and validation of patients' symptoms, explanation of symptoms and actions to manage symptoms.MethodsWe conducted an uncontrolled observational study in Northeast Scotland. GPs were recruited and received two days of structured training. Patients were identified via a two stage process (database searching followed by postal questionnaire) and received the SCI intervention from a GP in their practice.Treatment fidelity was assessed by applying a coding framework to consultation transcripts. Safety was assessed by examining changes in patient symptoms (PHQ-15) and checking for unexpected events. Acceptability was primarily assessed by patient interview.ResultsFour GPs delivered the SCI to 23 patients. GPs delivered all core components of the SCI, and used the components flexibly across the consultations and between patients. They spent more time on recognition than either explanation or actions components. 10 out of 17 patients interviewed described feeling validated, receiving useful explanation and learning actions. 9 out of 20 patients (45%) reported an improvement in PHQ-15 of between 3 and 8 points. Patients who reported the most improvement also described receiving all three components of the intervention.ConclusionsGPs can be taught to deliver the SCI with reasonable fidelity, safety and acceptability, although some items were inconsistently delivered: further training would be needed before use.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Research - Volume 84, May 2016, Pages 37–43
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,