Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types of stereotype threat on women’s math performance?

• This paper is a close replication of Chalabaev, Major, Sarrazin, and Cury (2012).
• We tested for an interaction between stereotype threat and achievement goals.
• We found no significant main or interaction effects for threat or goals.
• No significant effects emerged despite multiple controls.
• We suggest that the effect of stereotype threat may be weaker than commonly thought.

Stereotype threat is considered to be a robust effect that explains persistent gender gaps in math performance and scientific career trajectories. Some evidence suggests stereotype threat effects are buffered by adoption of performance avoidance goals (Chalabaev, Major, Sarrazin, & Cury, 2012). With 590 American female participants, we closely replicated Chalabaev et al. (2012). Results showed no significant main or interaction effects for stereotype threat or performance avoidance goals, despite multiple controls. We conclude that effects of stereotype threat might be smaller than typically reported and find limited evidence for moderation by avoidance achievement goals. Accordingly, stereotype threat might not be a major part of the explanation for the gender gap in math performance, consistent with recent meta-analyses (Flore & Wicherts, 2015).