کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
955662 1476122 2015 15 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Relational diversity and neighbourhood cohesion. Unpacking variety, balance and in-group size
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تنوع ارتباطی و انسجام محله؛ تنوع بازکردن، تعادل و اندازه گروهی
کلمات کلیدی
تنوع قومی؛ انسجام اجتماعی؛ سرمایه اجتماعی؛ مهاجرت؛ آنتروپی؛ فریبندگی گروهی؛ تهدید گروهی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی روانشناسی روانشناسی اجتماعی
چکیده انگلیسی


• New relational diversity indices unpack three dimensions of diversity.
• Dimensions link up to competing theories about effect of ethnic diversity on social cohesion.
• Findings speak against in-group favoritism and group threat theories as culprits.
• Instead evidence suggests cultural mechanisms (e.g. asymmetric preferences etc.) as drivers.

Ethnic diversity is typically measured by the well-known Hirschman-Herfindahl Index. This paper discusses the merits of an alternative approach, which is in our view better suited to tease out why and how ethnic diversity matters. The approach consists of two elements. First, all existing diversity indices are non-relational. From the viewpoint of theoretical accounts that attribute negative diversity effects to in-group favoritism and out-group threat, it should however matter whether, given a certain level of overall diversity, an individual belongs to a minority group or to the dominant majority. We therefore decompose diversity by distinguishing the in-group share from the diversity of ethnic out-groups. Second, we show how generalized entropy measures can be used to test which of diversity’s two basic dimensions matters most: the variety of groups, or the unequal distribution (balance) of the population over groups. These measures allow us to test different theoretical explanations against each other, because they imply different expectations regarding the effects of in-group size, out-group variety, and out-group balance. We apply these ideas in an analysis of various social cohesion measures across 55 German localities and show that both in-group size and out-group diversity matter. For the native majority as well as for persons of immigration background, the variety component of diversity seems to be more decisive than has formerly been acknowledged. These findings provide little support for group threat and in-group favoritism as the decisive mechanisms behind negative diversity effects, and are most in line with the predictions of theories that emphasize coordination problems, asymmetric preferences, and network closure.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science Research - Volume 53, September 2015, Pages 162–176
نویسندگان
, ,