کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1207497 1493715 2008 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Total alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon characterization and quantitative comparison of selected ion monitoring versus full scan gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based on spectral deconvolution
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Total alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon characterization and quantitative comparison of selected ion monitoring versus full scan gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based on spectral deconvolution
چکیده انگلیسی

Quantitative information of alkylated PAH is frequently used in forensic investigations to characterize petroleum releases and fate in the environment. Interference from a complex matrix often obviates target compound quantitation. Using single ion SIM or a single mass spectral pattern to analyze these homologs should result in either over- or underestimating their concentration. To confirm this hypothesis, a library of C1–C4 alkylated PAH fragmentation patterns were made from automated sequential two-dimensional GC–GC/MS data and the Ion Signature deconvolution software. Based on these patterns, 1D GC/MS data was compared using single ion extraction and one fragmentation pattern per homolog against data obtained from those peaks whose scans met the spectral deconvolution criteria. Significant overestimation occurs when a single ion is used to extract peak signal for C4-naphthalene, C1-fluorene, and the C1- to C3-dibenzothiophenes. In contrast, C2-naphthalene, C2-fluorene, C3-phenanthrene, and C1-dibenzothiophene were underestimated by >50% when one fragmentation pattern per homolog was used. The Ion Signature deconvolution software makes it easy to interpret mass spectrometry data, especially in complex environmental samples like diesel fuel.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Chromatography A - Volume 1205, Issues 1–2, 26 September 2008, Pages 109–116
نویسندگان
, , , ,