کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
172853 458566 2012 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of diffusion models in the modeling of a catalytic membrane fixed bed reactor coupling dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی مهندسی شیمی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of diffusion models in the modeling of a catalytic membrane fixed bed reactor coupling dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene
چکیده انگلیسی

Coupling of dehydrogenation of ethylbezene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene in a catalytic membrane reactor can lead to a significant improvement in the conversion of ethylbenzene and production of styrene. In this work, the homogeneous reactor model for a cocurrent flow configuration is compared to two heterogeneous models based on the Fickian diffusion model and the dusty gas model for both isothermal and non-isothermal pellets. It is observed that both heterogeneous models predict a significant drop in yield and conversion compared to the homogeneous model, indicating the importance of heterogeneity. This drop is generally less severe for the dusty gas model than for the Fickian diffusion model. The assumption of isothermality causes larger deviations than the assumption of Fickian diffusion. The deviations in the predictions of the homogenous model and the heterogeneous models from those of the dusty gas model for non-isothermal pellets are ∼6% and ∼11%, respectively.


► The homogeneous model overestimates the production rates of the reactor.
► The heterogeneous Fickian diffusion model underestimates the production rates.
► The prediction of the dusty gas is generally between the two reactor models.
► The maximum deviation observed by the homogeneous model is ∼11%.
► The worst deviation by the heterogeneous reactor model is ∼6%.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Computers & Chemical Engineering - Volume 38, 5 March 2012, Pages 11–23
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,