کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1761783 | 1019661 | 2008 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Automated Edge Detection Versus Manual Edge Measurement in Analysis of Brachial Artery Reactivity: A Comparison Study
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
فیزیک و نجوم
آکوستیک و فرا صوت
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
High resolution ultrasound, combined with computer imaging technology, is commonly used to measure changes in brachial artery diameter for the determination of endothelial-dependent vasodilation (EDD) and endothelial independent-vasodilation (EID). Currently, two methods of computerized edge-detection systems are in use to measure changes in artery diameter. One system involves the sonographer manually tracking the artery walls while the second system involves a computer automated edge-detection system that automatically tracks the artery wall. The purpose of this study was to compare the two types of computerized edge-detection systems for measuring vascular function and structure. One hundred fifty (female = 70, male = 80) participants agreed to participate. Baseline brachial diameter, carotid intima-medial thickness (cIMT), EDD and EID were measured by the two computerized edge-detection systems utilizing the same ultrasound B-mode image. Mean values (±standard error) for baseline diameter, cIMT, EDD and EID were 3.53 (±0.10) mm, 0.43 (±0.01) mm, 5.72 (±0.20)% and 22.17 (±0.60)%, respectively for the manual edge-detection software system. Mean values for baseline diameter, cIMT, EDD and EID were 3.59 (±0.10) mm, 0.44 (±0.01) mm, 7.33 (±0.30)% and 25.77 (±0.60)%, respectively for the automated edge-detection software system. Bland-Altman plots displayed large variations between the two edge-detection methods for assessing cIMT and changes in artery diameter following brachial EDD and EID. The results of the study demonstrate that manual and automated computerized edge-detection systems track dynamic changes in brachial artery diameter and cIMT measures differently. Therefore, caution should be used when comparing research utilizing different computerized edge-detection systems for measuring vascular function and structure. (E-mail: will0188@umn.edu)
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology - Volume 34, Issue 9, September 2008, Pages 1499-1503
Journal: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology - Volume 34, Issue 9, September 2008, Pages 1499-1503
نویسندگان
Eric B. Williamson, Ulf G. Bronas, Donald R. Dengel,