کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4181057 1276632 2006 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Preadolescent Methylphenidate versus Cocaine Treatment Differ in The Expression of Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Sensitization During Adolescence and Adulthood
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Preadolescent Methylphenidate versus Cocaine Treatment Differ in The Expression of Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Sensitization During Adolescence and Adulthood
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundMethylphenidate (MPH), the most commonly prescribed medication for childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), shares chemical and mechanistic similarities to cocaine which has stimulated research to address the addiction liability following treatment.MethodsUtilizing locomotor sensitization we examined the consequences of recurrent MPH versus cocaine treatment during preadolescence in altering cocaine-induced locomotor behavior in adolescent and adult mice. Black Swiss Webster mice were treated with MPH, cocaine, or saline during preadolescence. To test whether MPH pretreatment during preadolescence contributed to an altered sensitivity to cocaine during adolescence, these mice were treated with recurrent cocaine or saline during adolescence. All mice were challenged with cocaine as adults.ResultsRecurrent MPH treatment, unlike cocaine treatment in preadolescent mice, had no effect on locomotor sensitization to cocaine during adolescence or adulthood, as compared with saline controls. Furthermore, unlike cocaine, administration of MPH in adolescence did not augment the response to cocaine challenge.ConclusionsMPH treatment during preadolescence does not increase subsequent sensitivity to cocaine, whereas cocaine treatment does. Thus, MPH treatment during preadolescence does not appear to persistently induce long-term adaptations, which may underlie an enhanced liability for subsequent drug abuse.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biological Psychiatry - Volume 60, Issue 11, 1 December 2006, Pages 1171–1180
نویسندگان
, , , , ,