کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4202269 1609088 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Healthy store programs and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), but not the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), are associated with corner store healthfulness
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
برنامه های سالم فروشگاه و برنامه تغذیه مکمل ویژه برای زنان، نوزادان و کودکان (WIC)، ـ اما نه برنامه کمک تغذیه مکمل (SNAP) ـ با سالم بودن فروشگاه مرکزی در ارتباط است
کلمات کلیدی
رژیم غذایی؛ غذا؛ و تغذیه؛ بررسی تغذیه؛ محیط زیست محصولات غذایی؛ کمک های غذایی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Healthy corner store upgrades may increase stores' healthfulness.
• Corner stores that are WIC vendors are healthier than are non-WIC stores.
• Corner stores that are SNAP vendors are less healthy compared to non-SNAP vendors.

In response to lack of access to healthy foods, many low-income communities are instituting local healthy corner store programs. Some stores also participate in the United States Department of Agriculture's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This study used two assessment tools to compare the healthfulness of offerings at stores participating in local healthy store programs (upgraded stores), WIC, and/or SNAP to that of similar non-participating stores.Based on store audits conducted in 315 New Jersey corner stores in 2014, we calculated healthy food availability scores using subsections of the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey for Corner Stores (NEMS-CS-Availability) and a short-form corner store audit tool (SCAT). We used multivariable regression to examine associations between program participation and scores on both instruments.Adjusting for store and block group characteristics, stores participating in a local healthy store program had significantly higher SCAT scores than did non-participating stores (upgraded: M = 3.18, 95% CI 2.65–3.71; non-upgraded: M = 2.52, 95% CI 2.32–2.73); scores on the NEMS-CS-Availability did not differ (upgraded: M = 12.8, 95% CI 11.6–14.1; non-upgraded: M = 12.5, 95% CI 12.0–13.0). WIC-participating stores had significantly higher scores compared to non-participating stores on both tools. Stores participating in SNAP only (and not in WIC) scored significantly lower on both instruments compared to non-SNAP stores.WIC-participating and non-SNAP corner stores had higher healthfulness scores on both assessment tools. Upgraded stores had higher healthfulness scores compared to non-upgraded stores on the SCAT.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Preventive Medicine Reports - Volume 4, December 2016, Pages 256–261
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,