کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
461055 696535 2014 16 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Processes versus people: How should agile software development maturity be defined?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
فرآیندها در برابر مردم: چگونه باید بلوغ توسعه نرم افزار چابک تعریف شود؟
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی کامپیوتر شبکه های کامپیوتری و ارتباطات
چکیده انگلیسی


• Maturity definition in agile software development is not based on detailed process.
• Processes are necessary in agile maturity, but based on agile practices.
• Agile maturity means enabling more subjective capabilities.

Maturity in software development is currently defined by models such as CMMI-DEV and ISO/IEC 15504, which emphasize the need to manage, establish, measure and optimize processes. Teams that develop software using these models are guided by defined, detailed processes. However, an increasing number of teams have been implementing agile software development methods that focus on people rather than processes. What, then, is maturity for these agile teams that focus less on detailed, defined processes? This is the question we sought to answer in this study. To this end, we asked agile practitioners about their perception of the maturity level of a number of practices and how they defined maturity in agile software development. We used cluster analysis to analyze quantitative data and triangulated the results with content analysis of the qualitative data. We then proposed a new definition for agile software development maturity. The findings show that practitioners do not see maturity in agile software development as process definition or quantitative management capabilities. Rather, agile maturity means fostering more subjective capabilities, such as collaboration, communication, commitment, care, sharing and self-organization.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Systems and Software - Volume 97, November 2014, Pages 140–155
نویسندگان
, , , , ,