کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5045803 | 1475895 | 2017 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- The inverse association between positive affect and mortality risk is stronger in people reporting higher subjective stress.
- This finding supports the stress buffering model of positive affect and health
- Individual differences in positive affect may be most salient under challenging circumstances
ObjectivePositive affect is associated with longevity; according to the stress-buffering hypothesis, this is because positive affect reduces the health harming effects of psychological stress. If this mechanism plays a role, then the association between positive affect and mortality risk should be most apparent among individuals who report higher stress. Here, we test this hypothesis.MethodsThe sample consisted of 8542 participants aged 32-86 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) Epidemiological Follow-up Study (NHEFS). We used Cox's proportional hazards regression to test for the main effects of and the interaction between positive affect and perceived stress in predicting mortality risk over a 10Â year follow up period.ResultsGreater positive affect was associated with lower mortality risk. We found a significant interaction between positive affect and perceived stress such that the association between positive affect and mortality risk was stronger in people reporting higher stress. In the fully adjusted model, a standard deviation increase in positive affect was associated with a 16% (HRÂ =Â 0.84; 95% CIÂ =Â 0.75, 0.95) reduction in mortality risk among participants who reported high levels of stress. The association between positive affect and mortality risk was weaker and not significant among participants who reported low levels of stress (HRÂ =Â 0.98; 95% CIÂ =Â 0.89, 1.08).ConclusionOur results support the stress-buffering model and illustrate that the association between positive affect and reduced risk may be strongest under challenging circumstances.
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Research - Volume 100, September 2017, Pages 53-60