Pre-listing conservation of candidate species under the endangered species act: An evaluation of prevalence, accessibility, and market-based conservation efforts

- We analyze pre-listing conservation plans (PLCPs) and evaluate use of habitat markets.
- Among 34 PLCPs, species-based plans were more common than habitat-based plans.
- We found inconsistencies in plan documentation and rare use of market-based incentives.
- Accessible, transparent, and consistent PLCP databases will improve planning.
- Federal policies should encourage early creation of stringent mitigation requirements.

In 2011, a legal settlement required the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to develop a series of work plans to assess a backlog of candidate species for protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Using the resulting USFWS Fiscal Year 2013-2018 work plan, which included 261 candidate species, we identified and analyzed pre-listing candidate conservation plans (PLCP) to determine their characteristics and evaluate the use of market-based mechanisms. Among the 34 PLCPs identified, we found that species-based conservation plans were more common than habitat-based plans, and market-based conservation approaches were infrequently implemented. Inconsistencies in plan documentation were present throughout the USFWS's online portal, and not all documentation was publicly accessible. Lastly, we found that many states had implemented their own endangered species programs or initiated conservation plans through a state agency. Our work informs the recently-adopted USFWS pre-listing conservation policy and highlights needed improvements in tracking large numbers of at-risk species as they become the subject of regulations. Increased transparency and consistency in conservation plan databases, coupled with increased accessibility, will improve future at-risk species planning.