کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5432960 1398049 2017 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparative analysis of the mechanical properties of fiber and stainless steel multistranded wires used for lingual fixed retention
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تجزیه و تحلیل تطبیقی ​​خواص مکانیکی سیمهای چند منظوره فیبر و فولاد ضد زنگ مورد استفاده برای نگهداری ثابت زبان
کلمات کلیدی
سختی احتباس ثابت، سیم های مصنوعی، سفتی، سختی،
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی مواد بیومتریال
چکیده انگلیسی


- Three stranded wires demonstrated higher mechanical properties compared to fiber retainers.
- The application of different resins has no effect on tensile properties of EverStick group.
- Hardness is enhanced when filled resins are used for co-polymerization with EverStick fibers.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of different resins used for the co-polymerization of EverStick fiber-reinforced fixed orthodontic retainer on its mechanical properties and to compare the mechanical properties of these configurations to commonly used multistrand wires.Materials and methodsTen 0.0175-in. WildCat (WC175), ten 0.0215-in. WildCat (WC215) three-strand twisted wires and thirty EverStick fibers were tested in this study. The EverStcik fibers were equally shared in three groups (n = 10). The samples of first group (ESRE) were polymerized employing Stickresin (Light cure enamel adhesives), the second one (ESFT) employing Flow Tain (Light cured composite), whilst the specimens for the third group (ES) were not combined with resin. All samples were loaded in tensile up to fracture in a universal tensile testing machine and the modulus of elasticity, tensile strength and strain after fracture were recorded. The same groups were also tested employing Instrumented Indentation Testing (IIT) and Martens Hardness (HM), Indentation Modulus (EIT) and elastic index (ηIT) were determined. The results of tensile testing and IIT were statistically analyzed employing one way Anova and the Student Newman Keuls test (SNK) at a = 0.05 level of significance.ResultsWC175 and WC215 showed higher modulus of elasticity and tensile strength but lower strain after fracture compared to Everstic groups. IIT illustrated significantly higher values for HM, EIT, and ηIT for WC groups compared to ESRE, ESFT and ES. ESFT showed higher HM and elastic index compared to ESRE and ES, a finding which is attributed to the fact the FlowTain is a filler-reinforce composite with higher hardness compared to unfilled resins.SignificanceMultistrand wires demonstrated higher values in mechanical properties compared to EverStick ones. The co-polymerization with difference resins does not affect the tensile properties of Everstic, however the use of a light cured composite has a beneficial effect on hardness.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Dental Materials - Volume 33, Issue 5, May 2017, Pages e205-e211
نویسندگان
, , , ,