کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
566528 875992 2013 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Stimulation and measurement patterns versus prior information for fast 3D EIT: A breast screening case study
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی کامپیوتر پردازش سیگنال
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Stimulation and measurement patterns versus prior information for fast 3D EIT: A breast screening case study
چکیده انگلیسی

Imposing prior information is a typical strategy in inverse problems in return for a stable numerical algorithm. For a given imaging system configuration, Picard's stability condition could be deployed as a practical measure of the performance of the system against various priors and noise contaminated measurements. Herein, we make extensive use of this measure to quantify the performance of impedance imaging systems for various injection patterns. In effect, we numerically demonstrate that by varying electrode distributions and numbers, little improvement, if any, in the performance of the impedance imaging system is recorded. In contrast, by using groups of electrodes in the 3D current injection process, a step increase in performance is obtained. Numerical results on a female breast phantom reveal that the performance measure of the imaging system is 15% for a conventional combination of stimulation and prior information, 61% for groups of electrodes and the same prior and 97% for groups of electrodes and a more accurate prior. Finally, since a smaller number of electrodes is involved in the measurement process, a smaller number of measurements is acquired. However, no compromise in the quality of the reconstructed images is observed.


► Improved stimulation protocol for 3D impedance imaging.
► Suitable for excessive electrodes in 3D geometries, e.g., breast imaging.
► Reduction in the number of measurements and data acquisition timings.
► Improved performance for the same impedance imaging system.
► No compromise on the quality of reconstructed images.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Signal Processing - Volume 93, Issue 10, October 2013, Pages 2838–2850
نویسندگان
, , ,