کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5668117 | 1592331 | 2017 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- The rate of indeterminate HIV PCR results in infants is decreasing.
- The predictive value for positive results following indeterminates has increased.
- Indeterminate results should be treated with a high index of suspicion.
- Additional virological testing is crucial for infants with indeterminate results.
BackgroundSuppression of HIV by antiretroviral drugs may be one of the reasons that indeterminate HIV-1 PCR results are obtained from testing HIV-exposed infants. This complicates the early identification of infected infants, potentially delaying initiating treatment early. There is uncertainty as to how different vertical HIV transmission prevention regimens (VTP) affect the rate and predictive value of indeterminate PCR results.ObjectivesTo investigate rates of indeterminate PCR results, outcomes of subsequent samples and the predictive value of an indeterminate PCR for a later positive result in the setting of intensifying VTP in the Western Cape province of South Africa.Study designRetrospective laboratory data analysis. Diagnostic PCR data of a public health laboratory from June 2009 to October 2014 was analysed and categorised by South African VTP regimens. First indeterminate HIV-1 PCRs in patients younger than 12 months were linked with follow-up HIV-1 PCRs and/or serological tests. Linked results sets were analysed by PCR amplification characteristics and subsequent patient outcome.ResultsOver intensified VTP regimens, the rate of indeterminate and positive PCRs decreased significantly (5.6-3.2% and 2.4-0.4%, respectively; both p < 0.001). Most notably, significantly more patients with indeterminate results had positive PCRs on subsequent samples during WHO Option B+ use compared to older regimens (64.1% vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001) at a median 28 days later.ConclusionsIndeterminate HIV PCRs, although decreasing in frequency with Option B+, should be regarded with a high index of suspicion for being representative of true HIV-1 infections. Additional virological testing is required to arrive at a definitive diagnosis.
Journal: Journal of Clinical Virology - Volume 95, October 2017, Pages 86-89