کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5746648 1618803 2017 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil for a township in Jiangsu Province, China
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تقسیم بندی منابع و ارزیابی ریسک سلامت فلزات سنگین در خاک برای یک شهر در استان جیانگ سو، چین
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Soil heavy metals caused unacceptable health risks, mainly through homegrown food.
- Arsenic and chromium were the predominant hazardous elements.
- Waste incineration, textile/dyeing industries were the main anthropogenic inputs.
- Electroplating and livestock/poultry industries produced the highest health risks.

Human activities contribute greatly to heavy metal pollution in soils. Concentrations of 15 metal elements were detected in 105 soil samples collected from a typical rural-industrial town in southern Jiangsu, China. Among them, 7 heavy metals-lead, copper, zinc, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, and nickel-were considered in the health risk assessment for residents via soil inhalation, dermal contact, and/or direct/indirect ingestion. Their potential sources were quantitatively apportioned by positive matrix factorization using the data set of all metal elements, in combination with geostatistical analysis, land use investigation, and industrial composition analysis. Furthermore, the health risks imposed by sources of heavy metal in soil were estimated for the first time. The results indicated that Cr, Cu, Cd, Pb, Ni, and Co accumulated in the soil, attaining a mild pollution level. The total hazard index values were 3.62 and 6.11, and the total cancer risks were 9.78 × 10−4 and 4.03 × 10−4 for adults and children, respectively. That is, both non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks posed by soil metals were above acceptable levels. Cr and As require special attention because the health risks of Cr and As individually exceeded the acceptable levels. The ingestion of homegrown produce was predominantly responsible for the high risks. The potential sources were apportioned as: a) waste incineration and textile/dyeing industries (28.3%), b) natural sources (45.4%), c) traffic emissions (5.3%), and d) electroplating industries and livestock/poultry breeding (21.0%). Health risks of four sources accounted for 23.5%, 32.7%, 7.4%, and 36.4% of the total risk, respectively.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chemosphere - Volume 168, February 2017, Pages 1658-1668
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,