کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
676893 1459829 2014 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Methanol production via pressurized entrained flow biomass gasification – Techno-economic comparison of integrated vs. stand-alone production
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تولید متانول از طریق جابجایی زیست توده فاضلاب تحت فشار بالا مقایسه فنی و اقتصادی تولید یکپارچه و مستقل
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی تکنولوژی و شیمی فرآیندی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Techno-economic results regarding integration of methanol synthesis processes in a pulp and paper mill are presented.
• The overall energy efficiency increases in integrated methanol production systems compared to stand-alone production units.
• The economics of the integrated system improves compared to stand-alone alternatives.
• Tax-exempted biomass based methanol could compete with fossil petrol.

The main objective with this work was to investigate techno-economically the opportunity for integrated gasification-based biomass-to-methanol production in an existing chemical pulp and paper mill. Three different system configurations using the pressurized entrained flow biomass gasification (PEBG) technology were studied, one stand-alone plant, one where the bark boiler in the mill was replaced by a PEBG unit and one with a co-integration of a black liquor gasifier operated in parallel with a PEBG unit. The cases were analysed in terms of overall energy efficiency (calculated as electricity-equivalents) and process economics. The economics was assessed under the current as well as possible future energy market conditions. An economic policy support was found to be necessary to make the methanol production competitive under all market scenarios. In a future energy market, integrating a PEBG unit to replace the bark boiler was the most beneficial case from an economic point of view. In this case the methanol production cost was reduced in the range of 11–18 Euro per MWh compared to the stand-alone case. The overall plant efficiency increased approximately 7%-units compared to the original operation of the mill and the non-integrated stand-alone case. In the case with co-integration of the two parallel gasifiers, an equal increase of the system efficiency was achieved, but the economic benefit was not as apparent. Under similar conditions as the current market and when methanol was sold to replace fossil gasoline, co-integration of the two parallel gasifiers was the best alternative based on received IRR.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biomass and Bioenergy - Volume 64, May 2014, Pages 256–268
نویسندگان
, , ,