کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6820771 | 1434046 | 2018 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Validation of an algorithm-based definition of treatment resistance in patients with schizophrenia
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اعتبار سنجی از یک الگوریتم مبتنی بر تعریف مقاومت درمانی در بیماران مبتلا به اسکیزوفرنیا
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
مقاومت درمانی، کلوزاپین، جنون جوانی، اعتبار سنجی، حساسیت، اختصاصی، ارزش پیش بینی مثبت، ارزش پیش بینی منفی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
علوم اعصاب رفتاری
چکیده انگلیسی
Large-scale pharmacoepidemiological research on treatment resistance relies on accurate identification of people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) based on data that are retrievable from administrative registers. This is usually approached by operationalising clinical treatment guidelines by using prescription and hospital admission information. We examined the accuracy of an algorithm-based definition of TRS based on clozapine prescription and/or meeting algorithm-based eligibility criteria for clozapine against a gold standard definition using case notes. We additionally validated a definition entirely based on clozapine prescription. 139 schizophrenia patients aged 18-65Â years were followed for a mean of 5Â years after first presentation to psychiatric services in South-London, UK. The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm-based measure against the gold standard was measured with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). A total of 45 (32.4%) schizophrenia patients met the criteria for the gold standard definition of TRS; applying the algorithm-based definition to the same cohort led to 44 (31.7%) patients fulfilling criteria for TRS with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 62.2%, 83.0%, 63.6% and 82.1%, respectively. The definition based on lifetime clozapine prescription had sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 40.0%, 94.7%, 78.3% and 76.7%, respectively. Although a perfect definition of TRS cannot be derived from available prescription and hospital registers, these results indicate that researchers can confidently use registries to identify individuals with TRS for research and clinical practices.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Schizophrenia Research - Volume 197, July 2018, Pages 294-297
Journal: Schizophrenia Research - Volume 197, July 2018, Pages 294-297
نویسندگان
Olesya Ajnakina, Henriette Thisted Horsdal, John Lally, James H. MacCabe, Robin M. Murray, Christiane Gasse, Theresa Wimberley,