کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
7494237 1485659 2018 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the environmental and economic performance of using recycled gypsum cement and recycled aggregate to produce concrete: The case of Catalonia (Spain)
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تجزیه و تحلیل تصمیم گیری چند معیاره برای ارزیابی عملکرد محیطی و اقتصادی استفاده از سیمان گچ بازیافت شده و بازیافت جامد برای تولید بتن: مورد کاتالونیا (اسپانیا)
کلمات کلیدی
مجموع بازیافت شده، بتن، ضربه، ساخت و ساز، سیمان گچ بازیافت شده، بهینه سازی چند معیاره،
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی
The production of virgin raw materials used in construction and the generation of construction and demolition waste (CDW) are key environmental issues in the construction industry. Portland cement and concrete are used extensively in the construction sector. Processing of CDW to produce recycled gypsum cement and recycled aggregates (RA) and their use in the production of structural and non-structural concrete are one way of slowing natural resource depletion and reducing the amount of CDW landfilled. This study proposes the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to compare the production of “green” concretes made from recycled gypsum cement (RGC) and RA with the production of conventional concrete made from natural aggregate and ordinary Portland cement. The VIKOR MCDA method was employed to determine the best or a set of good alternative(s) for concrete production, considering environmental and economic criteria. The life cycle assessment method was used to select the environmental evaluation criteria, and the reference cost of producing concrete alternatives in Spain was used to determine economic criteria. The results of this study, in which environmental and economic criteria were considered of equal weight, or one of the two criteria was given greater weight, showed that the best option for structural and non-structural concrete was the use of RGC and RA. In both cases, the worst alternative was conventional concrete. In conclusion, we found that the use of RGC and RA in concrete production is positive because it replaces the original raw material, reduces the environmental impact, and lowers the economic costs.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Resources, Conservation and Recycling - Volume 133, June 2018, Pages 120-131
نویسندگان
, , , ,