کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
8108929 1522247 2017 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Emission of some pollutants from biomass combustion in comparison to hard coal combustion
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
انتشار برخی از آلاینده ها از احتراق زیست توده در مقایسه با احتراق زغال سنگ
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی مهندسی انرژی و فناوری های برق
چکیده انگلیسی
In the last decade biomass combustion has become one of the most important elements in the fight against global warming. For the sake of climate or environment protection people cut out large stretches of forests and burn them down It is widely believed that the combustion of wood and biomass is completely safe and does not cause any danger to people and the environment. Unfortunately, this is only a half truth. In fact, with considerably lower emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) from biomass combustion, significant amounts of organic micro-pollutants are emitted, among which there are more toxic compounds like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs). The aim of this paper was to assess the real situation. Seven samples of biomass were investigated, i.e. rape straw, oak bark, firewood and wood pellets, shrub willow and rape cake. Pulverized hard coal samples were used for comparison. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the pollution emission factors (per unit mass of fuel) of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO) and the sum of hydrocarbons (as total organic carbon - TOC) generated in the process of biomass combustion. Further, we compared the results obtained for coal as well as the effect of process operating conditions (temperature; air flow) on the emission factors. The investigations were carried out in a laboratory chamber furnace at five different temperatures (from 700 to 1100 °C) and at three different air flow rates providing an excess of oxygen. In many cases the determined emission indicators for biomass combustion were higher than for hard coal.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the Energy Institute - Volume 90, Issue 5, October 2017, Pages 787-796
نویسندگان
, , ,