کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
443968 | 692832 | 2016 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We present advanced mathematical model to perform 3D+time cardiac shape analysis.
• We construct 3D models of left-ventricular (LV) geometry from MRI cross-sections.
• This is achieved by mapping LV triangulated surface mesh to MRI contours.
• We compared hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease.
• Significant shape differences at ES and from ED to ES were identified.
The focus of this study was to develop advanced mathematical tools to construct high-resolution 3D models of left-ventricular (LV) geometry to evaluate focal geometric differences between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and hypertensive heart disease (HHD) using cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) cross-sectional images. A limiting factor in 3D analysis of cardiac MR cross-sections is the low out-of-plane resolution of the acquired images. To overcome this problem, we have developed a mathematical framework to construct a population-based high-resolution 3D LV triangulated surface (template) in which an iterative matching algorithm maps a surface mesh of a normal heart to a set of cross-sectional contours that were extracted from short-axis cine cardiac MR images of patients who were diagnosed with either HCM or HHD. A statistical analysis was conducted on deformations that were estimated at each surface node to identify shape differences at end-diastole (ED), end-systole (ES), and motion-related shape variation from ED to ES. Some significant shape difference in radial thickness was detected at ES. Differences of LV 3D surface geometry were identified focally on the basal anterior septum wall. Further research is needed to relate these findings to the HCM morphological substrate and to design a classifier to discriminate among different etiologies of LV hypertrophy.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (243 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Medical Image Analysis - Volume 29, April 2016, Pages 12–23