Testing the capability of the chemistry transport model LOTOS-EUROS to forecast PM10 levels in the Netherlands

Since particulate matter has a direct and adverse impact on public health, a good air quality forecast is important. Several European countries presently use statistical forecasting models, which have their limitations, especially for PM10. An alternative approach is to use a chemistry transport model. Here, the ability of the chemical transport model LOTOS-EUROS to forecast PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands was investigated. LOTOS-EUROS models several PM10 components individually. For sulphate, nitrate and ammonium aerosol the evaluation against observations shows that the modelled annual mean concentrations are within 20% of the measured concentration and that the temporal correlation is reasonably good (R > 0.6). For sea salt the model tended to overestimate the measured concentrations. For elemental carbon the correspondence with black smoke observations was reasonable. However, total PM10 is seriously underestimated, due to unmodelled components (secondary organic aerosols, mineral dust) and missing sources. Therefore, a simple bias correction for four seasons was derived based on the years 2004–2006. The model was compared with the Dutch operational statistical model PROPART and ground-level observations. With bias correction, LOTOS-EUROS performed better than PROPART regarding the timing of events. The major flaw of LOTOS-EUROS was that high values (>50 μg m−3) were still underestimated. Another advantage of LOTOS-EUROS over the statistical model was the more detailed information in space and time, which facilitates communication of the forecast to the general public.