Assessing geometric accuracy of the orthorectification process from GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 panchromatic images

GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 are the commercial very high resolution (VHR) satellites more innovative, unexplored and presenting the highest available resolutions nowadays. The attainable geopositioning accuracies from GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 single panchromatic images, both along the sensor orientation and orthorectification phases, are analyzed at the same study area and by using exactly the same ancillary data. The accuracy assessment was carried out depending on the following factors: (i) type of input satellite image (GeoEye-1 Geo, WorldView-2 Ortho Ready Standard and WorldView-2 Basic), (ii) sensor orientation model used (rigorous and based on rational function), (iii) number of well-distributed ground control points (GCPs) used in the triangulation process, (iv) off-nadir viewing angle, and finally (v) vertical accuracy of the DEM employed to conduct the orthorectification process.Regardless of satellite or product, the best horizontal geopositioning accuracies were always attained by using third order 3D rational functions with vendor's rational polynomial coefficients data refined by a zero order polynomial adjustment (RPC0). Focusing on WorldView-2 products, worse accuracies were yielded from Basic images than from Ortho Ready Standard level ones.As a general rule, and for attaining sub-pixel planimetric accuracies for the orthorectified GeoEye-1 Geo and WorldView-2 Ortho Ready Standard images and using RPC0 model with 7 GCPs, users should avoid off-nadir angles higher than 20° and use a very accurate DEM.

► A geometric accuracy comparison between GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 is carried out.
► Empirical and rigorous sensor orientation models are tested.
► Geopositioning accuracy of the orthoimages is studied based on an ANOVA test.
► Basic and Ortho Ready WorldView-2's products are tested.