کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5136023 | 1493451 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- CE was used to separate glycoforms of alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP).
- Several operating parameters were considered in optimizing this method.
- This method could separate nine glycoform bands within 20Â min.
- Good precision was obtained for both peak areas and migration times.
- This method could be used at clinically-relevant concentrations with absorbance detection.
- A charge ladder model was used to analyze the differences in the AGP glycoform bands.
A relatively fast and reproducible CE separation was developed for the glycoform analysis of α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). Factors that were considered included the pH for this separation and various techniques for coating the capillary and/or to minimize electroosmotic flow and protein adsorption. Optimum resolution of the AGP glycoforms was obtained at pH 4.2 with a running buffer containing 0.1% Brij 35 and by using static and dynamic coatings of PEO on the capillary. These conditions made it possible to separate nine AGP glycoform bands in about 20 min. The limit of detection (based on absorbance measurements) ranged from 0.09 to 0.38 μM for these AGP glycoform bands, and the linear range extended up to a total AGP concentration of at least 240 μM. The migration times for the glycoform bands had typical within-day and day-to-day precisions ofâ±0.16-0.23% or less, respectively, on a single treated capillary and the variation between capillaries wasâ±0.56% or less. A charge ladder approach was employed to examine the mass or charge differences in the glycoforms that made up these bands, giving a good fit to a model in which the neighboring bands differed by one charge (e.g., from a sialic acid residue) and had an average mass difference of approximately 0.7-0.9 kDa. The approaches used to develop this separation method are not limited to AGP but could be extended to the analysis of other glycoproteins by CE.
Journal: Journal of Chromatography A - Volume 1475, 2 December 2016, Pages 102-109