کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5969049 1576173 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A randomized, double blind pilot study to assess the effects of losartan vs. atenolol on the biophysical properties of the aorta in patients with Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A randomized, double blind pilot study to assess the effects of losartan vs. atenolol on the biophysical properties of the aorta in patients with Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes
چکیده انگلیسی


- There was a trend for losartan to decrease PWV after 12-months of therapy.
- There was a trend for atenolol to decrease hydraulic power and power per unit flow after 12-months of therapy.
- Atenolol and losartan may have different mechanisms of action on vascular function.

BackgroundPatients with Marfan (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz (LDS) syndromes have been shown to have abnormal aortic biophysical properties. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 12-months of therapy with atenolol or losartan on vascular function in young patients with MFS and LDS.MethodsSeventeen patients with MFS or LDS were recruited and randomized to treatment with atenolol, 25-50 mg, or losartan, 25 mg daily. Prior to treatment and following therapy, echocardiography for left ventricular size, function and aortic root size was performed. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), input (Zi, ZiF) and characteristic (Zc, ZcF) impedances, arterial stiffness (Ep and β-index), total arterial compliance (TAC), mean (Wm) and total (Wt) hydraulic power, efficiency, power cost per unit of forward flow (Wt/CI) and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were measured.ResultsThe atenolol group consisted of 9 females (17.6 years) and the losartan group 7 males and 1 female (17.0 years). Their height, weight, BSA, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar. Baseline to 12-month changes for atenolol and losartan were PWV (20% vs − 14%), Zi (− 2% vs − 27%), Zc (− 20% vs − 27%), Ep (1%, vs − 13%), β-index (10% vs 14%), FMD (11% vs 20%), TAC (3% vs 42%), Wm (− 24% vs 15%), Wt (− 24% vs 17%), and Wt/CI (3% vs 21%). There was a trend for losartan to decrease PWV and stiffness indexes while atenolol decreased power and power/unit flow.ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that atenolol and losartan may have different mechanisms of action on vascular function. A larger clinical trial is needed to confirm these effects.Clinical trials registration NCT00593710 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 179, 20 January 2015, Pages 470-475
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,