Two new soil moisture indices based on the NIR-red triangle space of Landsat-8 data

• Two new soil moisture indices are proposed using the NIR-red triangle space of Landsat 8 data.
• It is tried to deal with the vegetation issues for soil moisture estimation.
• Field soil moisture from two different study areas are used to validation of the proposed indices.
• A comparison between these indices and another model (SMMRS) is made.
• Real-time soil moisture map are produced for one of the study areas using Landsat 8 imagery.

In this study, the NIR-red spectral space of Landsat-8 images, which is manifested by a triangle shape, is deployed for developing two new Soil Moisture (SM) indices. First, ten parameters consisting of six distances and four angles were extracted using the position of a random pixel in this triangle. Then, some correlation assessments were made to derive those parameters that were useful for SM estimation, which were five parameters. To build a soil moisture index, all combinations of these five parameters, which were in total 31 different regression equations, were considered, and the best model was named the Triangle Soil Moisture Index (TSMI). The TSMI consists of three parameters. It showed a RMSE of 0.08 and correlation coefficient (R) of 0.67. Since the TSMI does not consider vegetation interface in SM estimation, the Modified TSMI (MTSMI), which takes into account the fraction of soil cover in each pixel, beside those parameters which were used in the TSMI, was developed (MTSMI: RMSE = 0.07, R = 0.74). The results of the TSMI and MTSMI were compared with each other, and with another soil moisture index (SMMRS introduced by Zhan et al. (2007)). It was concluded that the TSMI and MTSMI provide similar results for bare soil or sparsely vegetated surfaces. However, the MTSMI demonstrated a much better performance in densely vegetated surfaces. The accuracy of both the TSMI and MTSMI were significantly higher than the SMMRS. Moreover, the TSMI and MTSMI were validated by comparison with field measured SM data at five different depths. The results showed that satellite estimated SM by these two indices was more correlated with in situ data at 5 cm soil depth compared to other depths. Also, to show the high applicability of the proposed approach for SM estimation, we selected another set of field SM data collected in Australia. The results proved the effectiveness of the method in different study areas.